BeyondHeadlinesBeyondHeadlines
  • Home
  • India
    • Economy
    • Politics
    • Society
  • Exclusive
  • Edit/Op-Ed
    • Edit
    • Op-Ed
  • Health
  • Mango Man
  • Real Heroes
  • बियॉंडहेडलाइन्स हिन्दी
Reading: Advocate General to Argue on Modi’s Summoning in April
Share
Font ResizerAa
BeyondHeadlinesBeyondHeadlines
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • India
  • Exclusive
  • Edit/Op-Ed
  • Health
  • Mango Man
  • Real Heroes
  • बियॉंडहेडलाइन्स हिन्दी
Search
  • Home
  • India
    • Economy
    • Politics
    • Society
  • Exclusive
  • Edit/Op-Ed
    • Edit
    • Op-Ed
  • Health
  • Mango Man
  • Real Heroes
  • बियॉंडहेडलाइन्स हिन्दी
Follow US
BeyondHeadlines > India > Politics > Advocate General to Argue on Modi’s Summoning in April
IndiaLatest NewsPolitics

Advocate General to Argue on Modi’s Summoning in April

Beyond Headlines
Beyond Headlines Published March 22, 2011 19 Views
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE

Tejas Mehta

New Delhi: The hearing on the issue whether or not Gujarat Chief minister Narendra Modi and others should be summoned by a probe panel which is inquiring the 2002 Godhra riots cases, will now be held on April 22 before the First Bench of the Gujarat High Court. Advocate Mukul Sinha of Jan Sangharsh Manch concluded his arguments yesterday, and the advocate general sought time to argue the matter.

While addressing the bench comprising Chief Justice SJ Mukhopadhaya and Justice Aquil Qureshi on it’s various queries, Sinha submitted that the High Court has the jurisdiction to issue directions to the commission of inquiry. The court had earlier raised this query upon both the parties as to whether it can direct a commission of inquiry while exercising the power under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Addressing this issue, Sinha submitted, “The commission of inquiry is a statutory body and is duty bound to inquire upon the reference made to it in accordance with law. He stated that when a grievance is raised, then a court of law can decide and direct the commission in appropriate manner.”

Sinha submitted that questioning Chief Minister Narendra Modi, other ministers and police personnel, was essential and failing to do so would defeat the whole merit of constituting the commission for the purpose of making a public inquiry regarding the 2002 Godhra Carnage and subsequent communal riots triggered across the state.

He submitted that the commission has to enquire as to the adequacy or inadequacy of the administrative measures taken during the incidents of carnage and riots, role and conduct of the Chief Minister and others named in their application, and the role of political leaders in dealing with the situation. He stated that the Chief Minister, being the constitutional head of the state, was the main witness to answer the administrative measures taken. He stated that only Modi, being in power at that time and being the head of the state, can answer certain questions.

Sinha had moved an application before the Justices (retired) Nanavati-Mehta enquiry commission, the panel which is probing 2002 communal riots, to summon Chief Minister and few others and sought to cross examine them over their alleged role in the riots. After the plea was rejected, he has moved the High Court.

Curtsey: Law et al. news

TAGGED:2002 Gujarat riotsGujarat Chief minister Narendra ModiGujarat High CourtModi's summoningSIT
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Telangana Must Order CBI Inquiry into Alleged Murder of Advocate Moizuddin in Waqf Cases
India Waqf Facts
Waqf Registration Ends With Fears of Vanishing Properties
Exclusive India Waqf Facts
The Waqf Act 2025, Supreme Court Interim Ruling, and the Role of Muslims in Protecting Waqf Properties
Waqf Facts
Supreme Court Verdict on the Waqf Act: Justice or Just Temporary Consolation?
India Waqf Facts Young Indian

You Might Also Like

ExclusiveIndiaLead

What Happened After Assam Converted Madrasas into Schools? A Ground Report on Education, Identity, and Community Impact

June 4, 2026
Edit/Op-EdExclusiveHistoryIndia

Kamal Maula Mosque Controversy Explained: How History, Politics, and Faith Collided Over a Single Monument

May 22, 2026
IndiaLeadYoung Indian

Uttarakhand’s New Minority Education Overhaul: End of Madrasa Board, Curriculum Shift, and Rising State Control Explained

May 10, 2026
IndiaLatest News

Iran Consul General Praises India’s Humanity; No Legal or UN Basis for Attack on Iran, Says Dr Ausaf Sayeed

April 15, 2026
Copyright © 2025
  • Campaign
  • Entertainment
  • Events
  • Literature
  • Mango Man
  • Privacy Policy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?