Maulik Bharat Trust has filed a public interest litigation (PIL) in Delhi High Court against AAP leader and Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, accusing him of section 33(1) of Representation of Peoples Act 1951, among others. Below are the snippets/extracts from the PIL, released by the Trust. BH has reproduced it for its readers. – Editor
Followings are the features of this PIL
Charges on Arvind Kejriwal, CM , NCT Delhi
– Violation of section 33(1) of Representation of Peoples Act 1951
– In the affidavit submitted to election commission at the time of filling of nomination he submit the wrong detail of his Indirapuram plot. He also undervalued the cost of his property and mentioned its market value at Rs 55 lac. Present fair market value of he property is approximately Rs 2.4 caror. On the basis of circle rate i.e. Rs 63000/ per square mt also the cost of property is 1.4 caror. ( area of the plot is 222 square meter).
– He not provide correct address of above said property and nobody can reach there even Indian post.
– His intention was to present himself in out of voters as only lakhpati so he valued himself around Rs 92 lac in total. Its clearly a case of suppression of facts and misleading the voter.
– He shows his annual income Rs 2.05 lac per year but he not disclose the source of income. He claims himself to be in social and a political activist.
– In his affidavit he do not disclose the ownership of his present residence R – 902, girnaar Apartment, Kaushanbi, Gaziabad even a newspaper publish an electricity bill with his name on same address.
– He also defaulter of electricity department of UP electricity department.
– In his affidavit he shown his residential address 41, Hanumaan Road, New Delhi but never reside their.
– In his trust deed of PCRF he shown his residential address as 403 L,Girnaar, Kaushambi, Gaziabad but its detail are missing in his affidavit. Detail of PCRF office address also missing.
– In PCRF audited account of 2012 he shows that they return Rs 25.44 lac to the 468 persons due to the lack of information of donor. Its a contradictory fact in itself.
– In his affidavit he does not disclose his association with various NGO \ trust & society activities.
– Surprisingly in his affidavit he does not disclose any immovable property, insurance and FD etc.
– He took three year study leave with salary and after that he resign, its against the basic norms of honesty as he claim.
– His allegation to the recruitment process and capability of Civil Servant and their exam at the time of receiving Ramanmegsayesa Award. He always show distrust in constitutional bodies.
– At the time of receiving RM award he alleged that his senior asked him to accept bribe in the initial phase of his job but he never disclosed the name of that officer to any prosecution agency.
In these circumstances we request to the court –
– SIT/ CBI inquiry of fact which we produced.
– Verification and investigation of all affidavit submitted by candidate contest assembly election 2013 Delhi.
– Order to Government / Election Commission to generate a permanent mechanism to check and verify affidavit of all candidate willing to contest election.
– Cancel the election of Arvind Kejriwal because – A – He submit false affidavit B. Mislead to the voters C. Strong suspicion of involvement of national and international corporate groups and agencies.
D. Violation of P.R. Act 2002, section 33 a,b & 125A E. On false background his party want to contest Loksabha election soon.
F. EC failed to verify the fact present to them.
G. According to the Supreme Court ruling on 13 Sep 2013 that LAW BACKER CAN NOT BE LAW MAKER
