BeyondHeadlinesBeyondHeadlines
  • Home
  • India
    • Economy
    • Politics
    • Society
  • Exclusive
  • Edit/Op-Ed
    • Edit
    • Op-Ed
  • Health
  • Mango Man
  • Real Heroes
  • बियॉंडहेडलाइन्स हिन्दी
Reading: SC Grants Bail to Binayak Sen, Says No Case of Sedition
Share
Font ResizerAa
BeyondHeadlinesBeyondHeadlines
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • India
  • Exclusive
  • Edit/Op-Ed
  • Health
  • Mango Man
  • Real Heroes
  • बियॉंडहेडलाइन्स हिन्दी
Search
  • Home
  • India
    • Economy
    • Politics
    • Society
  • Exclusive
  • Edit/Op-Ed
    • Edit
    • Op-Ed
  • Health
  • Mango Man
  • Real Heroes
  • बियॉंडहेडलाइन्स हिन्दी
Follow US
BeyondHeadlines > India > Politics > SC Grants Bail to Binayak Sen, Says No Case of Sedition
IndiaLatest NewsLeadPoliticsSociety

SC Grants Bail to Binayak Sen, Says No Case of Sedition

Beyond Headlines
Beyond Headlines Published April 15, 2011 10 Views
Share
3 Min Read
Binayak Sen (C) greets relatives in Raipur in 2010. (AFP file photo)
SHARE

Tarique Anwar, BeyondHeadlines

New Delhi:  The Supreme Court has granted bail to civil rights activist Binayak Sen, who had been sentenced to life imprisonment on charges of sedition. An apex court bench comprising Justices H.S. Bedi and C.K. Prasad passed the order on the petition moved by Sen challenging the order of Chhattisgarh High Court denying him bail.

The court observed that there was no evidence against Sen and that “no case of sedition is made out. He is just a sympathizer, nothing beyond that. We are a democracy. Dr  Sen may be a Maoist sympathizer, but that does not make out a case of sedition.” Justice Prasad inferred that the possession of Maoist literature could not be used to prove a person to be Naxal just as the possession of Mahatma Gandhi’s autobiography would not prove one to be a Gandhian.

Sen, who is a vice-president of the People’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL), was accused of colluding with Maosists, was charged with sedition and was convicted. He was sentenced to life imprisonment by a Chhattisgarh trial court.

On February 10, the High Court of the insurgency-driven sate of Chhattisgarh denied bail to Binayak Sen, a 61-year-old paediatrician and activist who was arrested in 2007 on charges of waging war against India.

Opposing Sen’s bail plea, the Chhattisgarh government in its affidavit had said that the activist should not be granted any relief as “he has deep links with hardcore Naxalites.”

The affidavit filed by the state government reads: “He (Sen) provides active support and co-ordinates in spreading the base of CPI-Maoist in the country. Apart from providing logistic support, he exchanges information and material directly and indirectly with the Naxalites in the area of Chhattisgarh, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bihar, Jharkhand and Orissa and propagates Naxal ideology.”

Binayak Sen (C) greets relatives in Raipur in 2010. (AFP file photo)

The state government contended that Sen helped in arranging accommodation for Naxal leaders in Raipur and through his wife Elina, he also helped in opening bank accounts of hardcore Naxalites Shankar Singh and Amita Shrivastava.

A professional doctor and a pass-out of Vellore’s prestigious Christian Medical College (CMC), Sen sought bail pleading that the trial court had erred in convicting him when there was no substantial evidence against him.

Sen’s conviction was criticised by his supporters and even some international human rights bodies; some even sought the government’s permission to observe court proceedings in the case.

Binayak Sen has worked for 25 years as a doctor with tribals in Chhattisgarh. He criticised Salwa Judum for rights violations and misuse of powers. He was also a member of State Committee on Health Sector Reforms.

TAGGED:bail for binayak senBinayak Sen bailno sedition binayak sen
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Telangana Must Order CBI Inquiry into Alleged Murder of Advocate Moizuddin in Waqf Cases
India Waqf Facts
Waqf Registration Ends With Fears of Vanishing Properties
Exclusive India Waqf Facts
The Waqf Act 2025, Supreme Court Interim Ruling, and the Role of Muslims in Protecting Waqf Properties
Waqf Facts
Supreme Court Verdict on the Waqf Act: Justice or Just Temporary Consolation?
India Waqf Facts Young Indian

You Might Also Like

ExclusiveIndiaLead

What Happened After Assam Converted Madrasas into Schools? A Ground Report on Education, Identity, and Community Impact

June 4, 2026
Edit/Op-EdExclusiveHistoryIndia

Kamal Maula Mosque Controversy Explained: How History, Politics, and Faith Collided Over a Single Monument

May 22, 2026
IndiaLeadYoung Indian

Uttarakhand’s New Minority Education Overhaul: End of Madrasa Board, Curriculum Shift, and Rising State Control Explained

May 10, 2026
IndiaLatest News

Iran Consul General Praises India’s Humanity; No Legal or UN Basis for Attack on Iran, Says Dr Ausaf Sayeed

April 15, 2026
Copyright © 2025
  • Campaign
  • Entertainment
  • Events
  • Literature
  • Mango Man
  • Privacy Policy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?