BeyondHeadlinesBeyondHeadlines
  • Home
  • India
    • Economy
    • Politics
    • Society
  • Exclusive
  • Edit/Op-Ed
    • Edit
    • Op-Ed
  • Health
  • Mango Man
  • Real Heroes
  • बियॉंडहेडलाइन्स हिन्दी
Reading: Wikileaks: Prime Minister Likely to Respond to Opposition Charges
Share
Font ResizerAa
BeyondHeadlinesBeyondHeadlines
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • India
  • Exclusive
  • Edit/Op-Ed
  • Health
  • Mango Man
  • Real Heroes
  • बियॉंडहेडलाइन्स हिन्दी
Search
  • Home
  • India
    • Economy
    • Politics
    • Society
  • Exclusive
  • Edit/Op-Ed
    • Edit
    • Op-Ed
  • Health
  • Mango Man
  • Real Heroes
  • बियॉंडहेडलाइन्स हिन्दी
Follow US
BeyondHeadlines > India > Politics > Wikileaks: Prime Minister Likely to Respond to Opposition Charges
IndiaLatest NewsLeadPoliticsWikiLeaks

Wikileaks: Prime Minister Likely to Respond to Opposition Charges

Beyond Headlines
Beyond Headlines Published March 23, 2011 18 Views
Share
4 Min Read
Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh
SHARE

Tarique Anwar, BeyondHeadlines

New Delhi:  The storm over WikiLeaks cables on cash-for-votes scandal is likely to dominate House proceeding again today with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh expected to respond to the Opposition’s charges against him.

Yesterday, uproar over the issue virtually paralysed Parliament with the BJP staging a walkout. The party alleged that the Prime Minister “misled” the House by claiming that MPs were not bribed during the July 2008 trust vote even though the Parliamentary probe committee said that money was paid.

Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh

The WikiLeaks cable states that the Congress bought MPs ahead of its vote of confidence in 2008 over the nuclear deal with the US. But the PM told Parliament last week that there was no reason to believe that the cable was authentic, and that the Indian players mentioned in them have challenged the facts stated within.

“The Government rejects that allegation absolutely hands down. The allegations of bribery were investigated by the 14th Lok Sabha. The committee concluded that there was insufficient evidence to draw any conclusion of bribery,” he had said.

In Lok Sabha yesterday, the BJP-led NDA boycotted the debate on the Finance Bill in following differences with the government over the timing of taking up a discussion over the Prime Minister’s statement on the scam.

The main Opposition staged a walkout as soon as the Bill was moved by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee as it wanted the discussion on the Prime Minister’s statement to be taken up before the legislative business.

But the government insisted on taking up the Finance Bill first, saying it had been scheduled earlier.

“We agreed to short duration debate after the Finance Bill is passed. We have no problem to discussion under Rule 192, which does not entail voting. But please allow the Finance Bill to be passed first,” Finance Minister and Leader of the House Pranab Mukherjee said addressing the Opposition which was demanding the debate on the PM’s statement first.

“The Finance Bill has its own sanctity,” Mukherjee said, appealing for cooperation from the Opposition.

Leader of the Opposition, Sushma Swaraj, said the Opposition also wants passage of the Finance Bill but it should be taken up only after a two-and-a-half hour debate on the PM’s statement.

“It is a question of two-and-a-half hours…You allow debate, then we can have both… It is just a matter of earlier and later,” she said.

Swaraj said if the debate is allowed on the PM’s statement, “We are ready to sit here till 12 (to pass the Finance Bill).”

Countering Swaraj, Mukherjee said a precedent like this should not be created.

“You have given the notice for a Short Duration discussion today. Allow 24 hours. The discussion can take place tomorrow… The Finance Bill has been decided long ago. We should stick to the schedule,” he said.

PC Chacko, who was in the Chair, also ruled that the Finance Bill should be taken up first and Mukherjee started moving the Bill.

Unhappy over this, Swaraj led a walkout, asking the government to pass the Finance Bill without the main Opposition if it was so adamant.

(With NDTV inputs)

TAGGED:cash-for-votesPM statementTrust voteWikiLeaks
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Telangana Must Order CBI Inquiry into Alleged Murder of Advocate Moizuddin in Waqf Cases
India Waqf Facts
Waqf Registration Ends With Fears of Vanishing Properties
Exclusive India Waqf Facts
The Waqf Act 2025, Supreme Court Interim Ruling, and the Role of Muslims in Protecting Waqf Properties
Waqf Facts
Supreme Court Verdict on the Waqf Act: Justice or Just Temporary Consolation?
India Waqf Facts Young Indian

You Might Also Like

ExclusiveIndiaLead

Bulldozed Dreams: How Assam’s Eviction Drives Are Leaving Thousands Homeless and a Generation Without Education

June 16, 2026
ExclusiveIndiaLead

What Happened After Assam Converted Madrasas into Schools? A Ground Report on Education, Identity, and Community Impact

June 4, 2026
Edit/Op-EdExclusiveHistoryIndia

Kamal Maula Mosque Controversy Explained: How History, Politics, and Faith Collided Over a Single Monument

May 22, 2026
IndiaLeadYoung Indian

Uttarakhand’s New Minority Education Overhaul: End of Madrasa Board, Curriculum Shift, and Rising State Control Explained

May 10, 2026
Copyright © 2025
  • Campaign
  • Entertainment
  • Events
  • Literature
  • Mango Man
  • Privacy Policy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?